Improving the confidence of health professionals searching for best evidence using PICO
View File(s)
- Author(s)
- Details
-
Denise L. Blanchard, PhD, RN; Kim A. Van Wissen
- Sigma Affiliation
- Non-member
Visitor Statistics
Visits vs Downloads
Visitors - World Map
Top Visiting Countries
Country | Visits |
---|
Top Visiting Cities
City | Visits |
---|
Visits (last 6 months)
Downloads (last 6 months)
Popular Works for Blanchard, Denise L. by View
Title | Page Views |
---|
Popular Works for Blanchard, Denise L. by Download
Title | Downloads |
---|
View Citations
Citations
The purpose of this poster is to foster awareness and build the confidence of health professionals as they work to find a solution for clinical problems using best evidence. We identify that clinical problems are complex and within these, there are often multiple discrete problems that can be managed by searching effectively in the databases using the PICO tool to support the patient outcome.
Locating evidence to support clinical reasoning and decision-making needs a considered approach to finding the best possible information by the health professional. This means health professionals need to develop more efficient habits to search and locate evidence. Additionally, a positive patient experience relies on attention to detail by the health professional exercising a reasoned approach to gathering and utilising information.
At times, clinicians are unclear about finding and accessing the best evidence. Added to this, health professionals do not always know how to interpret and apply the information clinically or use it in their learning. To overcome this, we review how to ask questions about patient care and subsequently how to work within the databases. We suggest that asking questions in a logical manner helps the health professional to gain confidence in their ability to access evidence and assess the worth of evidence when applying it to solve clinical problems.
In practice, clinicians are commonly time-poor, hence searching for and applying the best evidence does not always take precedence in daily work. An existing tool, PICO, allows health professionals to pose clear clinical questions that allow more successful interrogation of databases for evidence. PICO can be used on ward rounds in the clinical setting to direct the clinicians thinking toward clear concepts or wording that has more success in finding meaningful evidence for clinical queries.
PICO is an acronym for Patient or Population problem, Intervention, Comparison and Outcome(s) and remains one of the best tools to help formulate questions to locate research from which to develop critical thinking that contributes directly to clinical interventions, which enhance clinical knowledge. In our experience, clinicians often find themselves asking clinical questions that are complex and need teasing out into several PICO formulated questions. PICO is a tool to help navigate and clarify how to interrogate and ask questions of the databases once questions have been narrowed down so databases can provide specific answers.
PICO remains one of the best tools to help locate research from which to develop knowledge about clinical interventions. PICO encourages the use of words inherent in databases as, for example, Major Headings to identify specific search terms and how they are mapped and linked throughout a database. PICO encourages health professionals to practise consistent search strategies in relevant databases and clarifies that there may be multiple PICO questions that they need to be aware of for any one patient. Ultimately, it is the patient outcome driving the use of the PICO tool so as to achieve patient-centred care as better outcomes for people with ill-health, for example, prevention of stroke.
While databases allow searches using natural language (everyday language), this may limit the success of finding information online, therefore, understanding a patient problem or the desired outcomes for the patient is key. It is essential that health professionals be able to translate the ‘natural language’ PICO into language orientated to that of the database they are searching within. This means a natural language search may not transfer to the database easily with the health professional experiencing, possibly, no results at all or so many results; they may just pick the first ten results and are unable to ascertain whether results are worthwhile following up. Therefore, it becomes essential for health professionals to be familiar with the database language, headings and concepts, to optimise their success in finding the best evidence.
Starting with the primary outcome agreed on for and with the patient is the health professional needs to plan the PICO from the desired outcome which ought to reflect a solution to the primary problem. As the health professional works to identify the primary outcome, they are most likely to encounter multiple outcomes that need to be addressed and these need to be decluttered and patient-centric. Additionally, in evidence-based health care, the professional needs to question what is the desired outcome is for this person. It may not relate to the primary problem, however, is as important as this is the patient perspective that needs to be included.
In this poster, we will provide a scenario example, identify the key clinical problem. From this, we will identify multiple problems that need to be addressed that feed into the solution to achieve the desired outcome. Asking questions of a clinical scenario we will demonstrate that for one patient, there are likely to be multiple PICOs that need to be built, answered and prioritised; that the way evidence is located will contribute to the prioritisation of clinical care and interventions.
Event Theme: Influencing Global Health Through the Advancement of Nursing Scholarship
Items submitted to a conference/event were evaluated/peer-reviewed at the time of abstract submission to the event. No other peer-review was provided prior to submission to the Henderson Repository.
Type | Poster |
Acquisition | Proxy-submission |
Review Type | Abstract Review Only: Reviewed by Event Host |
Format | Text-based Document |
Evidence Level | N/A |
Research Approach | N/A |
Keywords | Evidence-Based Practice; Patient Care; Research-Based Professional Practice |
Name | 28th International Nursing Research Congress |
Host | Sigma Theta Tau International |
Location | Dublin, Ireland |
Date | 2017 |
All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.
All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.
All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subjects.
-
Patient choice for people with long-term conditions: An interpretation by nurses
Van Wissen, Kim A.; Blanchard, Denise L.; Matheson, Annabel K.Nurses should support patients in the choices they make; particularly not stepping away from the difficult decisions patients are making as they live with multiple long-term conditions. This research offers a thoughtful ... -
Invisible nature of self-care: Clinical issues raised by people with multiple long-term conditions
Blanchard, Denise L.; Van Wissen, Kim A. (2017-07-27)The invisible nature of self-care undertaken by people with multiple long term conditions is under-researched. Our research shows people trivialise their important role in self-care. Nurses can improve patient outcomes by ... -
[Excerpt and supplemental materials for] Johns Hopkins evidence-based practice for nurses and healthcare professionals (4th ed.)
Dang, Deborah; Dearholt, Sandra L.; Bissett, Kim; Whalen, Madeleine; Ascenzi, Judith (Sigma Theta Tau International, 2021)This item record pertains to an excerpt from Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice for Nurses and Healthcare Professionals, Fourth Edition, which is provided free of charge by the publisher. About this book: Johns Hopkins ... -
Integrating evidence-based practice in a nursing curriculum based on the RNAO Guidelines using action research
Van der Walt, Christa; Vasuthevan, Sharon; Lubbe, Johanna Catharina (Irene); Smith, P. J. (2016-03-21)Session presented on Monday, November 9, 2015: Problem Statement: Evidence-based practice (EBP) is increasingly emphasized in healthcare, nursing practice and nursing and miwifery curricula. The same applies to South ... -
Exploring nursing practice discourse of keep type 1 diabetes under control through Foucault's Medical Gaze
Hooge, Sharon Lisa; Blanchard, Denise L.; Matheson, Annabel K.Nurses reading this presentation will be able to explore and identify what they see when working with persons with T1D and be challenged to look further at what they do not see in working with persons with T1D.