Physical restraint use among nursing home residents: A comparison of two data collection methods
Handle
http://hdl.handle.net/10755/621466Acquisition Type
Indexed from External Source (Per Creative Commons License)Review Type
External Review: Previously Published MaterialRepository Posting Date
2017-06-08T18:43:23ZLead Author Sigma Affliation
Non-memberOriginal Publisher
BioMed Central Ltd.Type
ArticleFormat
Text-based DocumentLevel of Evidence
N/AResearch Approach
N/ACINAHL Headings
Nursing Home Patients; Restraint, Physical -- Utilization -- In Old Age; Restraint, Physical -- Utilization; Restraint, PhysicalAbstract
Background
In view of the issues surrounding physical restraint use, it is important to have a method of measurement as valid and reliable as possible. We determined the sensitivity and specificity of physical restraint use a) reported by nursing staff and b) reviewed from medical and nursing records in nursing home settings, by comparing these methods with direct observation.
Methods
We sampled eight care units in skilled nursing homes, seven care units in nursing homes and one long-term care unit in a hospital, from eight facilities which included 28 nurses and 377 residents. Physical restraint use was assessed the day following three periods of direct observation by two different means: interview with one or several members of the regular nursing staff, and review of medical and nursing records. Sensitivity and specificity values were calculated according to 2-by-2 contingency tables. Differences between the methods were assessed using the phi coefficient. Other information collected included: demographic characteristics, disruptive behaviors, body alignment problems, cognitive and functional skills.
Results
Compared to direct observation (gold standard), reported restraint use by nursing staff yielded a sensitivity of 87.4% at a specificity of 93.7% (phi = 0.84). When data was reviewed from subjects' medical and nursing records, sensitivity was reduced to 74.8%, and specificity to 86.3% (phi = 0.54). Justifications for restraint use including risk for falls, agitation, body alignment problems and aggressiveness were associated with the use of physical restraints.
Conclusions
The interview of nursing staff and the review of medical and nursing records are both valid and reliable techniques for measuring physical restraint use among nursing home residents. Higher sensitivity and specificity values were achieved when nursing staff was interviewed as compared to reviewing medical records. This study suggests that the interview of nursing staff is a more reliable method of data collection.
Description
DL participated in the second line of statistical analyses, and drafted the manuscript. PV drafted parts of the document and contributed to the editing. RV contributed to the editing of the manuscript. PJD served as the Principal Investigator, designed the study, participated and oversaw field activity, revised and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. We are grateful to Diane Richard, RN, for expert advice and assistance during data collection. We also recognize the work of Josée Bourdages, PhD, for assistance during data collection, and of Claude Lapointe, MSc, and Zohra Benounissa, MScA, for statistical assistance.Date of Publication
2004-10-15Citation of Original Publication
Laurin, D., Voyer, P., Verreault, R., & Durand, P. J. (2004). Physical restraint use among nursing home residents: A comparison of two data collection methods. BMC Nursing 3 (1). DOI: 10.1186/1472-6955-3-5. Retrieved from http://www.nursinglibrary.org/vhl/handle/10755/621466Identifiers
ISSN: 1472-6955ISSN: BMC Nursing
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6955-3-5
Version of Publication
Publisher's versionNotes
This item appears in the Virginia Henderson Global Nursing e-Repository by way of the author’s decision to publish with BMC Nursing, an open access journal, under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0. The license allows users to freely share and adapt the author’s material for any purpose, even commercially. Please refer to the attached license (the icon at the bottom of this entry) for further information and terms. All terms of the license have been followed. There are no changes in this article from the original posting. Neither STTI nor the Henderson Repository has any affiliation with BMC Nursing. Each shares only a mutual desire to distribute nursing research in an open access venue.Visitor Statistics
The following license files are associated with this item:
