Identifying educational needs: Training gap analysis of United States Air Force aeromedical evacuation technicians/nurses
View File(s)
- Author(s)
- Details
-
Tiffany Losekamp-Roberts, MSN, RN, CNE, CHSE; Julie F. Roseboro, MS, BSN, RN, CCRN
- Sigma Affiliation
- Non-member
Visitor Statistics
Visits vs Downloads
Visitors - World Map
Top Visiting Countries
Country | Visits |
---|
Top Visiting Cities
City | Visits |
---|
Visits (last 6 months)
Downloads (last 6 months)
Popular Works for Losekamp-Roberts, Tiffany A. by View
Title | Page Views |
---|
Popular Works for Losekamp-Roberts, Tiffany A. by Download
Title | Downloads |
---|
View Citations
Citations
The United States Air Force (USAF) is curtailing its medical treatment facilities, thus reducing the number of opportunities for skill attainment and proficiency for flight nurses (FNs) and aeromedical evacuation technicians (AETs). Assignment to outpatient clinics and inpatient units with lower census and acuity creates skills gaps for aeromedical team members. It is critical that FNs and AETs demonstrate clinical expertise on the ground before they can be expected to proficiently care for combat or civilian wounded on an 8- to 12-hour flight in the back of a cargo aircraft within the en route care environment. Opportunities to practice these skills on the ground have been challenging, requiring the USAF to initiate alternative training opportunities. Current clinical prerequisites for active duty USAF FNs and AETs include a minimum of 2 years clinical experience (1 year inpatient experience is recommended), current Basic Life Support, current Advanced Cardiac Life Support (nurses), current registration in the National Registry of Emergency Medical Technicians (technicians), skilled in Air Force Specialty Code, and core clinical competencies such as patient assessment, blood administration, intravenous therapy, and management of the patient in hypovolemic shock. Clinical competency can be broadly interpreted across the various practice environments. FNs and AETs often attempt to maintain clinical competency in a simulation laboratory due to limited, or absent, opportunities to perform skills in a clinical setting with patients. Simulation has been shown to be an effective training method. Today's healthcare providers often learn high-risk and low-volume procedures in simulated environments, offering the chance to learn and practice in a safe setting (Fairhurst, Strickland, & Madden, 2011). Much like the civilian environment, the USAF is also using simulation for sustainment of skills. However, there is minimal information about the best way to train this unique AE population (O'Connell et al., 2013). Very little research exists to support simulation decisions in the USAF AE environment (O'Connell et al., 2013). A program of research was developed to provide an evidence base for decision making on education and training initiatives. An assessment of training needs was identified as a foundational study for this new trajectory of research within the USAF. A training gap analysis study was completed; the aims of this study were to (1) describe the clinical experience of active duty (AD) FNs and AETs and (2) identify the clinical education needs of the AD FNs and AETs. The aims of the study were accomplished concurrently through the use of a single paper survey developed by subject matter experts (SMEs). Content validity was developed using the established USAF clinical competencies and SME feedback. Survey questions identified clinical experience and level of comfort performing clinical tasks. A convenience sample of AD FNs and AETs assigned to one of the following AD aeromedical squadrons were invited to participate: Kadena Air Base, Japan; Pope Army Airfield, North Carolina; Ramstein Air Base, Germany; and Scott Air Force Base, Illinois. Over 100 AE clinicians participated in the study (n=102 following statistical exclusions). Since this study was descriptive and exploratory in nature, a power analysis was not conducted. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze results. Demographics of study participants were similar to a previous skills gap conducted on students attending the FN and AET course (n=198, officer 39%, enlisted 61%, tech training 51%, associate degree 7%, BS degree 36%, MS degree 7%) (De Jong, Dukes, & Dufour, 2014). Specifically, clinicians were half enlisted (50%) and half officers (50%) by rank; approximately half AETs (48%) and half FNs (49%); educated to a variety of levels, from Emergency Medical Technician/Paramedic (33%), Associate Degree Nurse/Associate Degree (9%), Bachelor's of Science in Nursing/Bachelor's of Science (39%), to Master's of Science in Nursing/Masters of Science (18%); and displayed varying years of patient care experience, from fewer than 3 years (4%), 3 to 5 years (38%), 5 to 10 years (35%), to greater than 10 years (23%). One hundred three participants reported their role and years of patient care experience, while 102 reported military rank and level of education and 100 provided duration in current assignment. This sample is representative of 25% to 33% of each AD aeromedical squadron. Analysis of clinician comfort, as measured by the developed tool, looked at various healthcare tasks. This revealed 10 key areas where FNs and AETs were less comfortable providing care (on a 5-point scale, 1=least comfortable, 5=most comfortable): managing neonatal patients (2.82), using a ventilator (2.87), treating labor & delivery patients (2.94), managing obstetric patients (3.19) and pediatric patients (3.48), managing a central line (3.49), giving blood components (3.61), managing hematology (3.62) and endocrine disorders (3.74), and treating burn victims (3.80). By comparing collected data to SME ranking of important skills to AE comfort level, several tasks were distinguished as more comfortable to AE clinicians than important to SMEs. Thus, these tasks were well-grasped by clinicians, and training regimens do not require focused intervention at this time. These tasks include monitoring vitals and pulse ox, using restraints, managing nasogastric tubes, and others. The data from this study revealed the typical clinical experience of FNs and AETs in the tasks they were most comfortable with and shed light on the tasks that must be emphasized in future training. This allows effective decision making related to training and competency tasks before clinicians take to the air with their AE squadrons.
The findings from this study will continue to build a foundation for education initiatives and allow for targeted interventions to meet sustainment needs of AD FNs and AETs. Given fiscal constraints, leadership has identified a need to provide an evidence base for educational initiatives. This study begins to provide an evidence base and future direction of skill sustainment training for FNs and AETs.
Creating Healthy Work Environments 2017: Best Practices in Clinical and Academic Settings. Held at the JW Marriott, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
Items submitted to a conference/event were evaluated/peer-reviewed at the time of abstract submission to the event. No other peer-review was provided prior to submission to the Henderson Repository, unless otherwise noted.
Type | Presentation |
Acquisition | Proxy-submission |
Review Type | Abstract Review Only: Reviewed by Event Host |
Format | Text-based Document |
Evidence Level | N/A |
Research Approach | N/A |
Keywords | Research; Simulation and Training |
Name | Creating Healthy Work Environments 2017 |
Host | Sigma Theta Tau International |
Location | Indianapolis, Indiana, USA |
Date | 2017 |
All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.
All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.
All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subjects.
-
Building a program of research for simulation in the United States Air Force strategic aeromedical evacuation/critical care air transport team system
Losekamp-Roberts, Tiffany A.; Dukes, Susan F.; Mortimer, Darcy (2016-08-11)Little research exists to support simulation decisions in the United States Air Force Aeromedical Evacuation (AE) environment (O’Connell et al., 2013). Building a program of research to provide an evidence base for ... -
Examination of HIV/AIDS in the United States Virgin Islands: Community needs assessment and gap analysis
Dalmida, Safiya George (2016-07-13)Session presented on Friday, July 22, 2016: Purpose: For over a decade, for over a decade, the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI) has consistently had one of the highest prevalence rates of HIV infection in the nation. The USVI ... -
Building a program to bring evidence-based practice to the U.S. Air Force nursing enterprise
Gallagher-Ford, Lynn (2017-07-28)This session will highlight the innovative work to create a successful EBP education and follow-up program to deliver improved care and significant outcomes in the United States Air Force(USAF)Nurse Corps. Details of ... -
Bridging the gap: Using simultaneous multi-patient simulations to improve nursing competency and transition to practice: A causal-comparative inquiry
Fomenko, JulieTwenty-first-century healthcare is a complex and demanding arena. Today’s hospital environment is more complex than in previous years while patients move through the system at a much faster pace. Newly graduated ... -
An examination of freshman non-nursing students' attitude toward nursing as a career choice for males in the Southeastern United States
Cox, Tiffany GordonThe nursing shortage is predicted to continue into the year of 2030. Governmental and nongovernmental healthcare stakeholders have recognized a key factor in decreasing the shortage is to increase the recruitment and ...