Evaluating Debriefing Methods For High Fidelity Simulation
Sabrina Glesmann, BSN, RN; Angela Kastner, BSN, RN; Monika Venteicher, BSN, RN
- Sigma Affiliation
Visits vs Downloads
Visitors - World Map
Top Visiting Countries
Top Visiting Cities
Visits (last 6 months)
Downloads (last 6 months)
Popular Works for Glesmann, Sabrina by View
Popular Works for Glesmann, Sabrina by Download
The purpose of this study is evaluating effectiveness of debriefing. The PICO(T) question asks “for nurse educators debriefing in simulation (P) how does using the Debriefing for Meaningful Learning (DML) method (I) compared to other simulation debriefing methods (C) influence simulation debriefing effectiveness as evidenced by a debriefing evaluation?” Simulation creates problems for educators to ensure the experience meets best practice standards and guarantee quality learning opportunities. A comprehensive literature search was completed using online databases for evidenced based peer reviewed articles. Faculty driven debriefing, high-fidelity simulation, debriefing comparisons, effective debriefing, and the Debriefing for Meaningful Learning Method (DML) were inclusion criteria.
|Review Type||Peer-review: Single Blind|
All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.
All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.
All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.