Association between burnout, DNA methylation, and work environment among interprofessional clinical and non-clinical staff
Linda Y. Kim, PhD, MSN, RN, PHN, CPHQ, Research Scientist; Wenrui Xu, MPH, Clinical Research Specialist; Harriet Aronow, PhD, FAAN, Research Scientist IV; Mana Manoukian, MSN, RN, AGCNS-BC, Clinical Nurse Specialist; Bernice Coleman, PhD, ACNP-BC, FAHA, FAAN, Research Scientist III
- Sigma Affiliation
- Gamma Tau at-Large
- Contributor Affiliation(s)
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
Visits vs Downloads
Visitors - World Map
Top Visiting Countries
Top Visiting Cities
Visits (last 6 months)
Downloads (last 6 months)
Popular Works for Kim, Linda Y. by View
Popular Works for Kim, Linda Y. by Download
Purpose: About 35-54% of nurses and physicians in the U.S. suffer from burnout. Currently, there is a lack of an objective biologic measure of burnout. This study will assess the feasibility of using DNA methylation (DNAm) as a biomarker of healthcare provider burnout and identify work conditions, particularly during a pandemic, that would inform future implementation of targeted strategies to reduce healthcare provider burnout.
Method: Cross-sectional, feasibility study. Participants included clinicians (nurses and physicians, n=31) and non-clinicians (n=25). Burnout and the work environment were measured using the Maslach Burnout Inventory, Areas of Worklife Survey, Pandemic Experience & Perceptions Survey. OGD-600 saliva collection kits were used to collect for the DNAm analysis. Bivariate analysis was conducted to assess the relationship between the work environment factors and the three subcategories of burnout. For the multivariable models, all statistically significant bivariate results (p< 0.05) were included in the multivariable analysis. DNAm was analyzed via whole genome bisulfite sequencing.
Results: Clinicians reported higher emotional exhaustion (p=0.047) and depersonalization (p<0.001) as compared to non-clinicians, while no significant differences were reported in personal accomplishment between the two groups. Higher workload and lower community were identified as predictors that contribute most to higher emotional exhaustion for clinicians as compared to non-clinicians. Lower control and lower resources were identified as predictors that contribute most to higher depersonalization. Analysis results on the relationship between DNAm and self-reported levels of burnout are pending.
Conclusions/Implications: Our study underscores the importance of a comprehensive and tailored program aimed at improving various aspects of the work environment that can meet the needs of both clinicians and non-clinicians alike. Targeted strategies including clinician peer support groups to improve a sense of community and shared decision-making opportunities to enhance feelings of control may be also helpful in decreasing emotional exhaustion and depersonalization among clinicians.
Dr. Kim was a recipient of the Sigma/American Nurses Foundation Grant, 2019-2020 cohort.
The Sigma Theta Tau International grant application that funded this research, in whole or in part, was completed by the applicant and peer-reviewed prior to the award of the Sigma grant. No further peer-review has taken place upon the completion of the Sigma grant final report and its appearance in this repository.
|Review Type||None: Sigma Grant Recipient Report|
|Research Approach||Quantitative Research|
Healthy Workplace Environments;
All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.
All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.
All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.
The following license files are associated with this item:
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subjects.
Creating Healthy Work Environments 2017: Building a Healthy Workplace: Best Practices in Clinical and Academic Settings Sigma Theta Tau International (2017-03-21)This is a printable archival version of the Creating Healthy Work Environments 2017 official program book, with included abstracts and schedule.
Creating Healthy Work Environments 2019: Best Practices for Building Healthy Workplaces in Clinical and Academic Settings Sigma Theta Tau InternationalThis is a printable archival version of the Creating Healthy Work Environments 2019 official program book, with included abstracts and schedule. This item is also available on Issuu
Optimizing Communication Between Professional Nurses and Physicians-in-Training to Promote a Healthy Work Environment Frankoff, Candelaria J.; Armijos, Ana Elisabeth; Brown, Sidney Lauren; Bush, Ardis; Garcia, Vanessa; Marabiles, Jocelyn; Kirksey, Kenn M.A comprehensive evidence-based practice study was implemented by nurse leaders and nurses working at the point-of-care in order to discover optimal strategies for promoting communication and collaboration between nurses ...
Healthy Work Environment Best Practices: Supporting Leaders in Evidence-Based Management Decision Making Towards Clinical Nursing Excellence Bajnok, Irmajean; White, Sara; Pallas, Linda O'Brien (2012-01-11)Healthy work environments are a critical component of quality patient care, nurse satisfaction, and organizational effectiveness. In an attempt to provide supports for those in leadership positions to enable evidence-based ...
Saliva-extracted DNA is a noninvasive sampling technique for examining OPRM1 gene methylation in preterm infants Hatfield, Linda A.; Hoffman, Rebecca K.Mitigating pain in early life may prevent epigenetic changes that increase an individual’s susceptibility for developing chronic pain. Adverse effects and the quality of the DNA collected challenge the suitability of ...