Integrative reviews part 2: Critiquing integrative reviews of nursing education literature
Acquisition Type
Proxy-submissionReview Type
Abstract Review Only: Reviewed by Event HostRepository Posting Date
2020-03-09T19:00:28ZAuthor(s)
Brodersen, Lisa DoreenAuthor Details
Lisa Doreen Brodersen, EdD, PhD, RN, CNE, Allen College School of Nursing, Waterloo, Iowa, USALead Author Sigma Affliation
Pi KappaOther Title(s)
Deep DiveType
PresentationFormat
Text-based DocumentLevel of Evidence
N/AResearch Approach
N/AAbstract
Synthesis of the rapidly expanding nursing education literature is essential for translating knowledge into nursing education practice. When conducted systematically and rigorously, integrative reviews can render an intimidating volume of research and other evidence readily accessible and useful to busy nurse educators. Although there is ample published guidance for conducting and reporting integrative reviews, the extent to which guidelines are followed can only be known through critical scrutiny by readers of manuscripts and published reviews. In this session a process for reviewing integrative review manuscripts will be proposed, and criteria for critiquing published integrative reviews will be described.
Conference Name
Nursing Education Research Conference 2020: Transforming Nursing Education Through Evidence Generation and TranslationConference Location
Washington, DC, USAConference Year
2020Conference Identifier
NERC20C15Notes
All rights reserved by author(s)/presenter(s) unless otherwise stated in this item record or attached files.Visitor Statistics
Citations
Show Citations
The citations below are meant to be used as guidelines. Patrons must make any necessary corrections before using. Pay special attention to personal names, capitalization, and dates. Always consult appropriate citation style resources for the exact formatting and punctuation guidelines.
