Development of an Instrument to Measure Quality of Nurses' Worklife
Author Information
- Author(s)
- Brooks, Beth A.
- Details
-
Dr. Beth A. Brooks, RN, PhD, FACHE
- Sigma Affiliation
- Alpha Lambda
Visitor Statistics
Visits vs Downloads
Visitors - World Map
Top Visiting Countries
Country | Visits |
---|
Top Visiting Cities
City | Visits |
---|
Visits (last 6 months)
Downloads (last 6 months)
Popular Works for Brooks, Beth A. by View
Title | Page Views |
---|
Popular Works for Brooks, Beth A. by Download
Title | Downloads |
---|
View Citations
Citations
The citations below are meant to be used as guidelines. Patrons must make any necessary corrections before using. Pay special attention to personal names, capitalization, and dates. Always consult appropriate citation style resources for the exact formatting and punctuation guidelines.
Abstract
This study reports the development process and factor structure of a questionnaire to measure quality of nursing work life for registered nurses in hospital settings. Included is information on item generation, content validation, initial pilot testing, and results from the full study.
The instrument was administered to registered nurses in Illinois. Confirmatory factor analysis using maximum likelihood estimation was used to examine the fit of the data with the hypothesized measurement model. Two rival models were also tested. Chi-square (X2 (819) = 3,220.70, p < .0001), goodness-of-fit indices (CFI = .48, GFI = .63, AGFI = .60), and parsimony ratios (GFI = .60, NFI = .39) were analyzed for the hypothesized four factor model. The chi-square analysis, fit indices, and parsimony ratios indicated another model would be a better fit. A revised four factor model was estimated based on Lagrange multiplier tests and theoretical considerations.
Chi-square (X2 (819) = 3,050.23, p < .0001), goodness-of-fit indices (CFI = .52, GFI = .67, AGFI = .64), and parsimony ratios improved slightly (GFI = .64, NFI = .43) for the revised model and parameter estimate t-tests for all but three items were significant at p ≤ .05. Internal consistency reliability for the final instrument sub-scales included an alpha coefficient of .56 for the 4 item Work life/Home life Scale, (n = 265), .58 for the 11 item Work Design Scale, (n = 265), .88 for the 21 item Work Context Scale, (n = 265), and .49 for the 6 item Work World Scale (n = 265). An exploratory factor analysis revealed a two factor solution, but the two factors made little conceptual sense and were not amenable to being named. Evaluation and recommendations regarding the questionnaire are included.
Description
This dissertation has also been disseminated through the ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. Dissertation/thesis number: 3008064; ProQuest document ID: 230791938. The author still retains copyright.
Notes
This item has not gone through this repository's peer-review process, but has been accepted by the indicated university or college in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the specified degree.
Acquisition Type
Proxy-submissionReview Type
None: Degree-based SubmissionRepository Posting Date
2019-11-20T17:44:20ZType
DissertationFormat
Text-based DocumentLevel of Evidence
OtherResearch Approach
Quantitative ResearchDegree Information
Grantor | Advisor(s) | Level | Year | University of Illinois at Chicago, Health Sciences Center | Reichelt, Paul A. | PhD | 2001 |
---|
Rights Holder
All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.
All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.
All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.